Blog – Page 16 – Tahmid Chowdhury

Why I chose to leave my government career

In the last few weeks, I’ve connected with a number of individuals interested in knowing more about what it’s like to leave the UK Civil Service. So I thought it might be an interesting chance to write about why I chose to leave, what opportunities lie elsewhere and some of the issues I have had to face in doing so.

I’m going to talk about my own experience particularly working as an official in the UK government. Nonetheless, many of the points here will likely be relevant to anyone who is currently finding themselves interested in their next move, particularly so if you are either feeling a little stuck or in need of a new challenge.

I joined the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) in 2017. Prior to that, I had shorter, placement and internship experiences in HM Treasury, the European Commission and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. So in total I had spent around five years in the policy making space.

My time at BEIS was definitely a positive one, and I would certainly recommend spending time in the UK Civil Service for anyone who may be interested. I gained a wide range of policy-making skills, spanning several varied roles and I took advantage of learning opportunities by building my own personal qualifications. In my four years there, I gained a Level 6 Diploma in Leadership and Management and became a certified practitioner Agile Project Manager. I also went on a number of training courses including a development programme over the course of the year. BEIS in all was a great opportunity for me to learn.

Like any employer, it was not all sunshine and rainbows. Working on Brexit for a number of years took its toll, and whilst the developments meant more job opportunities internally (which meant I was able to get promoted faster than usual), it also led to me at times working in poorly structured teams, sometimes with unsupportive and underskilled managers who had been promoted quickly without a whole lot of management experience.

I also became exhausted with the change, I had numerous director changes, Group name changes, policy shifts, ministerial changes and a few elections in my time. Brexit felt like a never-ending treadmill of new deadlines and changing goalposts, with pretty unrealistic expectations of what civil servants were meant to achieve.

In the last year or so, I found it particularly destabilising working under the most recent government. Namely in its public attacks on Civil Servants, who were often blamed for many issues publicly by Ministers, as well as being used as economic tools by being ordered during COVID to get back into our London offices to buy sandwiches and restart the economy.

I worked on Diversity and Inclusion issues throughout my time in government, and it became increasingly difficult under a Government who railed against a ‘woke agenda’, including within Government. This meant suddenly activities being arm-twisted away from ‘above’, including a lot of progress being halted due to some Special Adviser somewhere not liking what we did. It’s no wonder that a lot of BAME colleagues I know have recently left, many of which who were pioneers in advancing race and wider diversity issues.

On top of this all, I realised that the chances of me progressing further was pretty slim. Due to the way the Civil Service is structured, there are few opportunities for progression after a certain point of seniority. I also became growingly disillusioned at how I saw my white colleagues get promoted past me, often to find them having mediocre management skills which would often make my life a nightmare for the first 6-12 months as they actually learnt how to do their role. This happened to me several times.

I also realised my value and additional qualifications I had gained were not really valued – instances included senior officials ignoring advice around project management (despite sending me on a project management course!), and all my efforts around diversity and inclusion being boiled down to a £500 voucher, and when I would use these examples in job applications internally I was often sifted out as these seemingly not ‘the right types of examples’.

So with a mixture of disillusionment within Government and an impending deadline of Brexit, I decided I wanted to move to the Continent to build my career in the EU policy-making space. For me this was a culmination of decisions based around my personal-life (where do I want to live?) and wanting to try something outside of government with a different set of experience and more space for creativity.

It is quite scary moving out to the big wide world outside government. The system encourages people to stay within, to the point where people move around constantly whenever they get tired with their roles. It can be pretty easy to lose touch with how employers work outside of government, and how the application process can greatly differ externally.

The unfortunate reality is that job hunting is a lot of work, and it took me many months of re-learning the rules of the game and building a better understanding of what I really wanted to do before I ultimately left. This often leads to people sometimes feeling they get a little stuck within their roles, often finding themselves in a spiral of being unsatisfied in a role because of the pressure and expectations, meaning they do not have time to genuinely search for a new role. I certainly empathise with this situation, though unfortunately it is something you may have to grind out.

Now being on the other side of it, I would certainly recommend leaving, if not to only have it as an option. There are often far more interesting roles than we might realise outside of government, with a growing level of flexibility and opportunities that would suit your particular needs, often that government might not be able to (like in my example when it came to physical location). On top of that, returning to Government is actually far easier than previously, meaning you can leave and join again. Ironically for me, by leaving I’ve given myself a better space to progress and return at a higher level than I would have by staying.

The pain points will often be a mixture of overwhelm at what is out there, as well as uncertainty around how to translate government experience into what recruiters are asking for. This will take time and commitment, so if you are considering leaving I would highlight how much time and effort it takes. But being on the other side of the process, I would certainly recommend it.

I hope this article is helpful in talking through some of the things you might find yourself going through, or simply to understand more about why people leave organisations. I’d love to hear from you if you found this helpful!

Why a British, black, senior spy only happens in the movies

It’s been a few weeks since I watched the new James Bond film. I very much enjoyed it, both since it had been months since I had been in a cinema, and because it was a well-directed and enjoyable ride. A little bit of escapism during a year of lockdown has certainly been welcome. If you haven’t watched it, some light spoilers to follow!

I enjoyed the thoughtful way in which a more diverse and representative cast was chosen, whilst also ensuring that these individuals had a chance to express themselves and subvert some of the older tropes – particularly around the ‘bond girls’.

The sequence in Cuba gave Ana de Armas a great opportunity to give personality to her character and act more than just an add-on – no doubt a positive influence from bringing Fleabag writer Phoebe Waller-Bridge into the team. It made the whole section of the film feel fresher and more human then just another old-style shootout that we’ve seen many times before.

The casting of Lashana Lynch as ‘Nomi’ as a new ‘007’ was an interesting twist which highlighted a sense of changing of the guard. I certainly applaud the increase in diversity within the cast, and the fact that Nomi was able to demonstrate her Afro-Caribbean roots in real terms within the movie – indeed that is how she is introduced to us as the audience. It was seen as giving her value, as it helped her blend in and not raise suspicion – a benefit to having an ethnic minority as a spy.

That said, having worked in Government I couldn’t help the niggling feeling of how this might give an unrealistic expectation of how inclusive the UK Government and the Secret Service is. Now I know this is a fictional plot, and that in reality spies don’t go around in high stakes missions shooting up the place every day. Indeed, I remember watching with a slightly furrowed brow that Vesper was supposedly an HM Treasury official heading off to an espionage mission in Casino Royale. I’m not sure I was aware of any espionage missions from colleagues at my time in HMT, but then again I was an intern, so perhaps they didn’t tell me about that stuff?

One area that was not meant to be fictitious was the idea that a black woman would make it as a young, ambitious individual into a senior position of responsibility and gaining a key role as 007. And whilst I can’t say for definite that this is not the case – I don’t have exclusive access to personal information about those who work in the secret service – what I can say is that the UK government still a long time away to reaching the utopian space where a black woman would be able to genuinely reach senior positions without barriers to progression, particularly at a young age.

My experience in Government demonstrated that the older, less transparent parts were the most lagging in diversity and inclusion. For example, I worked in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (again as an intern) and was struck by how differently it was run compared to other Government departments. The big rooms with old statutes gave an uncomfortable feeling of colonial pride, which felt odd as an ethnic minority. Hierarchies were firm, and open and inclusive ways of working were far less advanced. This was ‘just how things were’, and since it was the Foreign Office, the rules needed to be different.

For those of us who have worked in the space of Diversity and Inclusion, one of our main measures to drive change was an open, transparent approach to the issues, using things like representation statistics of individuals within the organisation, staff surveys and public perceptions of the organisation as a means to drive positive change. Without these levers, it is tough to move a big organisation (including those in Government) to drive any real change. So for the Secret Service, an organisation which is based in secrecy, this feels an extremely uphill battle.

There are also the practical points. For example, the highest UK security clearance in the UK requires extensive background checks on family members, including distant relatives. For those of us from ethnic minority backgrounds, we are far less likely to be able to track our full family history due to the movement across countries and continents. And even when we can, it doesn’t help that many of us having relatives in ‘suspicious’ countries which plays a part. On the one hand, an extensive background check makes sense, though on the other hand I have no doubt it would particularly penalise ethnic minority individuals. And to be clear, failing these checks would mean you cannot work in these posts. There may be some way this penalty could be mitigated, but I am not convinced this has been properly explored as of yet.

I have heard that the way that the Secret Service in the UK used to recruit was quite literally a tap on the shoulder of certain individuals from Oxford and Cambridge who seemed the ‘right sort’. Now naturally things have moved on with a more open recruitment process, but these stories have an effect of what is seen as the ‘right sort’ and how the culture of the organisation plays out in practice. If you were to be a young, black woman growing up in inner city London, what are the chances that you would seriously consider working in the secret service? My guess would be that you would probably not even think that they would want someone like you, and it could be that this is the case.

So I leave with some mixed feelings around the representation of a black woman as the new ‘007’ in the film. On the one hand, representation in films is critical, and can actually do wonders in inspiring those young black women to think about such a career. On the other hand, I can’t help but feel the film gives a false narrative of how truly inclusive we are of ethnic minorities in the workplace in Government, and how far we still have to go.

‘As ye sow, so shall ye reap’ – the failure of organisations to tackle racism

When former Yorkshire Cricket Club (YCCC) player Azeem Rafiq made allegations around racism during his time at the club which led him ‘close to committing suicide’, one of the first interventions came from Roger Pugh, then Yorkshire South Premier League Chairman. Pugh took the uninvited opportunity to highlight Rafiq as ‘discorteous, disrespectful and very difficult’.

‘Indeed, over the five years in which we have been in existence, he is the only person in our league that I have had any issues with… I am not a religious man, but a biblical quote seems to me apt here. It is, ”as ye sow, so shall ye reap.”‘

In other words, Pugh took the opportunity say that Rafiq deserved to be subject to racist abuse due to him being ‘difficult’. Pugh was later forced to resign, but offered no apology when doing so.

This event in of itself would be quite shocking. Unfortunately, the saga around the Yorkshire Cricket Club’s handling around racism has only gotten worse as time has gone on. I’ve personally found this particularly depressing, both as an avid cricket fan and having previously gone to Headingley – Yorkshire’s ground – several times as a student during my time in Sheffield. With a high ethnic diaspora around Yorskhire, this compounds a club more worried about saving face than genuinely being interested in tackling racism, let alone building an inclusive relationship with minorities.

For anyone who has worked in Diversity and Inclusion, the following sequence of the ‘investigation’ around these events aren’t particularly surprising (even if they are depressing). Following the reports of racism, YCCC first ordered an ‘independent’ investigation. In reality, the ‘independent’ firm was Squire Patton Boggs, a former employer of the Yorkshire board’s chairman, Roger Hutton. The investigation was to be over the course by Xmas 2020.

Instead, it took until August 2021. On the Yorkshire board itself were two of the accused members of the investigation – chief executive Mark Arthur and director Martyn Moxon. In other words, several of those implicated had decision-making authority on what happened with the report.

After this long delay, the Board issued ‘profound apologies’ after it found Rafiq was ‘victim of inappropriate behaviour’, however they deemed there was insufficient evidence around evidence of institutional racism. This was all done without the report being released (claiming they could not due to ‘data privacy’), meaning a complete lack of transparency and questions only getting louder around the real contents of the report.

In September, the Board eventually released a summarised finding of the report which found that Rafiq was the victim of ‘racial harrassment’ and ‘bullying’. However, once again they reiterated that they could not release the report, and that there was no evidence of institutional racism.

By October, political pressure started to mount. An Employment Judge ordered YCCC to give the full report to Rafiq by 8 October, which to date they have still not done. A leaked version of the report highlighted that Rafiq was continuously referred to as P*ki – a slur against south asians – by team mates. Whilst the original version was reported by media to suggest this did indeed show a culture of racism, the Yorkshire board disagreed, and overruled this judgement, instead describing it as ‘banter’. Other comments included teammates of Rafiq asking him whether his uncles owned corner ships, and at one point a senior player approaching Rafiq and a few other South Asian players and stating that there were ‘too many of you lot, we need to do something about it’.

Last week, YCCC doubled down and released a report stating they were ‘pleased’ to announce their actions – no player or coach was deemed to face disciplinary action. Later, another teammate, Gary Ballance came out stated he was the one who used the racist slurs, but did so in an environment where this was common place, and said he was indeed a close friend of Rafiq.

With the lack of movement and growing anger at the opacity, sponsors are now pulling out – Nike will not renew their deal, whilst Emerald Group, Tetley’s and Yorkshire Tea are ending their association. This morning, Roger Hutton resigned as the chairman of Yorkshire with immediate effect. And whilst that would sound like welcome news, in reality he was one of the supporters of more transparency, whereas the aforementioned Arthur and Moxon were reported to be the larger blockers. They remain in place.

The drama does not stop here. Rafiq along with the YCCC Board members have been summoned in front of the House of Commons Digital Culture, Media and Sport Committee to give evidence this month. Rafiq, under parliamentary immunity is likely to be far more explicit than he has been now, whilst we will likely see a mixture of denial and blame shifting from the Board members that turn up.

So what can we learn from this sorry state of affairs? On the one hand, it is positive that politicians, sponsors and fans are raising their voice against what looks as a cover-up and sham. On the other hand, this event highlights how ill equipped a business such as Yorkshire Cricket Club is at dealing with a culture of racism within its organisation.

Moreover, it demonstrates how the interest of the organisation can shift to cover is backs rather than actually dealing with the issue at hand. It also highlights the difference between what an organisation says it does, compared to how it is in reality – there has been a recent PR blast from YCCC around its pathways and inclusion activities to try and brush away the questions being asked. Most depressingly of all, both Arthur and Moxon sit on the Equality and Diversity Committee within YCCC, which suggests how flawed the committee really is.

The reality is that these sorts of incidents occur in many organisations. Unfortunately, many are not public-facing organisations like Yorkshire Cricket Club, meaning these attempts at obfuscation and faux-action often work. For Rafiq, has has had to wait over a year since the investigation was launched, and any attempts of genuine accountability is being resisted to the bitter end.

So what can we learn from this? Well, organisations must not assume that they do not have racist or uninclusive cultures simply because they affirm ‘they are not racist’. Allegations such as these need proper mechanisms to be dealt with, and these need to be taken seriously. With a growing level of consciousness around the issues of racism in the workplace, these sorts of cases are only going to become more common.

From a personal perspective, I believe this is going to be a long-term battle. It is tiring simply following this saga due to its poor handling and daily twists and turns. That is not to mention what it means for me on a personal level – would I want to attend a Yorkshire Cricket Club match in the future? (Indeed the England Cricket Board has suspended international matches for the foreseeable future at Headingley). The original allegations also brought up stories of racism that members of my family faced at grass-roots level which are still commonplace (‘do you even speak English?’)

To me, this whole saga demonstrates the importance for organisations to continue working on diversity and inclusion within their culture. Otherwise, we risk alienating those who are different. There is plenty of work to do, but inaction only risks a public blow-out similar to that which Yorkshire Cricket Club are currently experiencing.

What adult biking lessons taught me about successful sustainability policy

Having recently moved to Brussels, it was about time I built up my confidence of cycling. By chance, I found a bike shop that runs adult cycling lessons. So figuring I would probably put it off otherwise, I signed myself up during the summer and let me future-self worry about the logistics.

This weekend was the first class of four. It was a pleasant experience with the weather holding out (particularly considering it’s October in Brussels!). But as a policy geek, I found the experience fascinating as much as from my observations as the physical task of rolling down a slight incline without touching the floor.

Perhaps it was because the practice session was right in front of the European Parliament, however I could not help but make observations around what adult biking lessons meant from a wider policy perspective. (It was either that or I have worked in policy for too long and have lost the ability to socialise with normal human beings).

My first observation was the group. It was notable that our session was made up with a high majority of woman, many of which came from ethnic minority backgrounds. Of those, many had attested to never having ridden a bike before, or feeling embarrassed and discouraged from doing so. One woman mentioned that you would never see female cyclists in her hometown in France, meaning she never got into the habit. I wouldn’t be surprised if street harassment or catcalling played a part in that either.

Others highlighted that they had been looking for adult biking lessons for years – one person I even overheard attesting they had waited over seven years looking for a course. It was incredible to think that a lack of lessons had been holding these people back from something that many of my friends use as their day-to-day means of transport.

So what does this have to do with policy? Well firstly, it is incredible how a lack of adult cycling classes are currently holding our society back. The class I had signed up to was completely oversubscribed and was only running again in March. In other words, there was incredible demand, but nowhere near enough supply. The price I paid at 130 euros for four lessons was clearly very accessible, but my presumption was that this is not the most profitable for the bike shop.

You rarely see policy opportunities that are home-runs, though this is as close to one I have come across – a subsidisation of adult biking classes would lead to a greater number of cyclists, both combating climate change by changing consumer behaviour and Brussels’ horrendous traffic in one fell swoop. Better yet, these classes were being strongly attended by women and ethnic minorities, meaning it is genuinely supporting those who statistically tend to get left behind from policy actions.

Another observation was around the amount of psychological fear that individuals had to cross. Many of these individuals had traumatic experiences with bikes. This included examples of others telling them to jump on and it’ll be as easy as, well, riding a bike. The reality was usually a failure, as many of us forget the initial practice of learning the basics. Instead, we were fortunate to get proper practice by doing small exercises with support from instructors to build confidence.

From a policy perspective, we need people to feel secure in trying new things or using new technology. This needs proper guidance and support; moreover this does not magically happen unless we devote time and energy to do so. For those of us who already understand how something works, we often forget the difficulties of learning a new process – be it riding a bike or using technology. So when creating our policies, we need to dedicate the time to explain them and build confidence on the new tools we want people to use.

To zoom out even further, the experience highlighted the disconnect of policymaking at a supranational level compared to what we are seeing with individuals on the ground. I say this as someone who certainly supports the new EU policy measures announced this summer, including the European Green Deal which aims for Climate Neutrality by 2050.

Nonetheless, there is clearly more work to be done to link up long-term vision with what is happening on the ground – we need to better understand the way people act and how we can support them to be more comfortable around sustainability. Local action is just as important as the EU-supranational level, so we must not lose sight of making our policy have a genuine effect on the ground.

So I am glad I signed up for these cycling classes. Aside from learning that I don’t need too much more practice, it also gave a genuine insight of how we can tailor policy to be effective to real people on the ground. Now all I need to do is rest my legs for next week’s class.

Doing good deeds without expecting rewards will give you better outcomes.

I want to share a story about a good deed I did about four years ago. After a conference abroad, someone I had met was stranded in a bus stop. They needed 20 euros to get home, otherwise they would miss their connections, and ultimately not be able to get home when they lived thousands of miles away. Back then 20 euros was worth more to me than it is now, and yet it was still little compared to the complications of being stranded thousands of miles from home!

I lent the 20 euros, and quickly forgot about it. the person tried to send it back to me but because of bank issues we never fully organised the transfer of it back. I wasn’t honestly too bothered.

Fast forward to about a week ago, this person messaged me about this money completely out of the blue. Their financial situation had improved and they wanted to pay their dues. After about 10 rounds of figuring out how Western Union worked, this person ended up sending me double, i.e. 40 euros, which I collected on Tuesday.

I actually asked this person what made them send the money to me four years later, and they said they had noted it down they owed me all this time. I just find it remarkable that people remember a good deed you did for so long, and in the end I got double the money back without having even tried!

—

Acting with kindness and supporting others are ideas that most people will get behind. As humans, we are hard wired to want to help others in their problems. We like the idea of doing something that will genuinely help others. This can make us feel useful, powerful, and give us a nice little warm feeling when we receive a little message of thanks from someone we know.

Quite often we act to help others, though implicitly have some expectation of reward at the end. A waiter/waitress may be extra nice for a tip, with our clients we may go the extra mile to sign them on, or we may work even harder for our boss in expectation for that promotion.

Our kindness therefore starts to build some strings attached to it. If we are nice to our client, and they don’t give us their tip, or contract, we are likely to feel pretty disappointed afterwards. It makes it harder for us then to act kind with the next client, as our priority shifts instead to what the reward is for our actions, rather than doing it out of our own genuine will to help others.

The ironic thing in life is that often doing things without expecting a reward will ultimately bring you better reward than if you actively tried. As this waiter, if you act kind to all your clients, through the laws of averages you will earn more tips throughout your time than in the individual circumstances.

But perhaps the waitering example is a bit of a specific example, does this really happen in other places in your life too? After all, this sounds all a little spiritual for someone who works in a high pressure office environment, especially if it can be quite cut throat!

In reality, many people gain success through their personal and professional lives by being nice and doing kind deeds consistently. Elbowing your way to a promotion may get you the reward now, but people will remember your actions. Whereas someone who has consistently helped others will find that many will be willing to help them later down the line when they are struggling, for example a redundancy or personal crisis. And furthermore, in our world, networking and positive relationships are critical. We want to build genuine connections, and the best way to do that is by being nice, without expecting that it will lead to something with everyone you speak to.

As a coach, we spoke a lot about genuinely looking to serve. We aim to help our clients, so when we are stuck we can use the guiding principle of ‘what would actually be useful for this person?’. It means I can help my client genuinely find solutions to what they need, and gives me licence to say things either more gently if the message is not going to be received well, or sometimes stronger to deliver an uncomfortable truth that I think they will benefit from hearing. I’ve also found this an extremely helpful guide on how to speak with others in every facet of my life.

As a coach, I am loathe to ‘advise’ people how to behave. And yet, if I could encourage you to think about something, it is this: observe how you act in your day to day interactions, and see if you can bring more kindness into it. Where you are being kind, see whether there is some implicit expectation behind this, and see whether you can do anything to make this unconditional.

I hope you enjoyed my story, please do let me know what you think!

How I prepared for big changes in my life

I’ve been on my own personal rollercoaster this month. I’ve just finished moving countries during a pandemic, where I returned to my flat in London that I haven’t been in for over a year. Since I’ve travelled from abroad, I had to quarantine in a shared house with housemates. In the midst of that, I had to finish my job and return my laptop (one final day back in the office!). Unfortunately due to the circumstances, the best way to do this was in the space of two weeks, making everything have an added time pressure.

I had to finalise moving out, organise my things to send them through boxes, and finally return to Brussels on the train with a bunch of luggage. This was essentially five full days of waking up, packing and selling furniture with pauses to eat. With a lot of it in quarantine, I couldn’t really move outside the room that I was trying to move out of either. (Oh, and my bed broke, meaning I had to build a new one before moving out too!)

In total, I’ve taken 6 PCR tests (all negative!), completed two separate quarantines, moved out of a flat and signed my contract for my new job after having finished my final day in the last one.

So I wanted to write a little bit about how I prepared for this pretty grueling few weeks. Ahead of time, I wasn’t particularly looking forward to my month of July due to these reasons. I’ve made life-changing decisions in an intense time pressure, all the while worrying that one positive COVID test would through all my moving-out plans out of the window. Such decisions aren’t easy at the best of times, but they are even more complicated during a worldwide pandemic.

I’ll start by saying I am a planner at heart, which meant I am quite used to meticulously planning an itinerary of dates. I enjoy having the dates checked, and tend to be a fairly organised person. So for me, at least making sure the dates worked was something I was personally more comfortable with. That said, I also spent a pretty substantial amount of time worrying over the details and often getting overwhelmed by the challenge I was about to face (which is the downside of being a planner!).

I was fortunate that lockdown ended in Belgium in June, meaning I could restart my yoga practice which really helped me here. Rebuilding some strength was certainly helpful for carrying boxes, though that was only a part of it! I found my moments of pause and reflection allow me to process a lot of emotional baggage that I knew was to come.

Moving flats is always tiring and stressful, and there were also a lot of changes I had to come to terms with – saying goodbye to my place of work for the past 4 years, and moving away from my country of birth. On top of that, it would be a stilted and unsatisfying goodbye as due to COVID I only saw a few people before leaving.

Unexpectedly, the quiet time for reflection I had during yoga made me feel these emotions quite intensely a good month in advance. But unlike the usual bouts of worrying which tended to help rather than hinder, it allowed me to emotionally process some of the difficulties I anticipated. It was a strange experience being sad ahead of time it actually left me feeling quite despondent, despite nothing yet having passed. And yet, if I didn’t take that time beforehand, the emotions would have been much more difficult to handle when I was in London, making the experience even more stressful.

Outside of yoga, I had some time to properly reflect as to whether moving countries was the right thing for me. Working with my own coach, as well as taking time to reflect on my own values, I had time to really accept that what I was doing was right for me. Although I still have small waves of doubts, this has given me a clarity of purpose over the last few weeks to keep soldiering on without having that feeling that this is all a terrible mistake.

Coming out of the other side of this, I still feel pretty exhausted, and there are still some hurdles to come. Still, I feel I’ve broadly achieved something here by managing so many life changes in an intense amount of time. I’m not going to pretend that I did everything perfectly, or that the last month hasn’t taken an emotional toll either.

But I think that there are some valuable things that you might be able to take by reading this, particularly in dealing with the emotional side for big changes. My observation is that whilst we often plan the physical side, the mental side can be something we might neglect. Even if you might not do yoga, you may find an alternative which gives you space to properly emotionally process what is going on around you. Taking time to reflect on what you really want and being clear on how your decisions are leading to that are also really important.

So I hope sharing this experience is helpful for you, do let me know in the comments!

How to stop being the bottleneck for your team

Many of us have suffered the frustrations of our work proposals getting stuck in the inbox of our bosses. We’ve likely spent hours crafting a work proposal with an extremely tight deadline, only to find this missed by 4 days because our head of unit has not responded in a week. This can quickly kill our productivity, motivation and innovation without much effort.

So we can certainly recognise the negative experience of being stuck by a bottleneck. But what if the bottleneck for your team is actually you without realising it?

I’ve certainly seen my fair share of bottlenecks from my corporate experience. Often this comes from a mixture of reasons, though it usually comes with the perception that the leader is either uncertain or too overwhelmed to make real decisions.

Although the easy answer would be to simply label our leadership as incompetent, I see this as a overly simplistic response; there must be more to this phenomenon when we see capable individuals falling into this trap as they lead teams. This is particularly bizarre when we see individuals getting promoted for their ability to ‘get things done’, and yet when we see them leading a wider team, efficiency and productivity can often plummet.

I’ve actually coached around this issue before, though individuals rarely see themselves as bottlenecks at first. Instead, the issue relates to general trust and empowerment around teams. Unfortunately, the capable individual who was promoted for being effective now is responsible for making other people effective, which is a very different skill set. The individuals tend to stick to the same skills that got them this far, rather than reassessing the needs of their new job.

This can often lead to leaders asking to check every document or note from their team. They may want oversight of every detail or process, and to have input at each stage. This fits in their idea of ensuring high quality and taking pride in their work. Indeed, it is how they have operated to get the promotion in the first place.

Unfortunately, being a leader means having only a limited amount of time with a far greater amount of responsibilities. Such leaders can therefore get completely bogged down in editing small pieces of work (or even micromanaging it), whilst the rest of their inbox is ignored. And when faced with middling results, rather than reassess this approach, leaders often double-down and simply work longer hours to get through everything they are responsible for. This has the negative effect of building a culture of long hours, and one where your employees may be waiting until 8pm for your yes/no response to their email.

I would much prefer leaders to see themselves as conduits rather than bottlenecks. Their aim is to facilitate the successful passage of their team’s work into the wider organisation, whilst giving key support and input at the appropriate stages. What this requires is a far greater level of trust in the abilities of their staff, and acceptance that no one is going to be perfect from day one.

Currently, whilst we hear much about collaboration and trust, we often see the real story in how our managers behave. I’ve seen both sides of this, from a story about a PA who wasn’t even allowed access to their leaders emails, to an honest and open discussion about upcoming challenges from another leader. The former gives the sense of insecurity and control, the latter that the leader is a reasonable and approachable human.

So if you’re a leader, think about how your work is perceived by your team. You may be inadvertently working yourself to the ground, and with it, making your team perform much worse.

Do you have any stories of ‘bottleneck’ leaders you want to share?

What it’s like to work in Government

I’ve been working in the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) in the UK Civil Service for the last four years. I have been based in Whitehall, at 1 Victoria Street, close to the Houses of Parliament. I had internship stints in the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, the European Commission and HM Treasury.

It’s been a fascinating journey since I’ve joined BEIS. I’ve had the fortune of moving around a few different positions and gaining a wide range of experience in a relatively short amount of time. I started working on EU policy whilst the UK was still a Member State. I worked on the coordination of the EU Council of Ministers meetings. This meant working with Ministers and policy leads to create a briefing and itinerary for an international meeting. I even went with my Minister to Brussels to attend the Competitiveness Council and see how EU negotiations happened in practice.

Later, I was the policy lead on the European Accessibility Act, where I worked with analysts and lawyers to set our negotiating position for the EU file. This meant working closely with stakeholders and doing short and sharp analysis to ensure the best result for the UK Government.

At the end of 2018 I took a team lead role within the legislation team. I ensured that the necessary legislation was in place to ensure a functioning statute book by the end of EU Exit. In practice, this meant organising the delivery of over 40 ‘Statutory Instruments’ – pieces of secondary legislation to amend UK law. I learnt plenty about the complexities around legislation, and how government makes things happen in practice to ensure that policies thought up within Whitehall are actually put in place.

I’ve most recently moved into my current role within the Regulated Professions team. I take on a wider programme management role to ensure that a team of over 30 staff are delivering a wide array of work – be it from international negotiations, stakeholder engagement and policy delivery. My highlight in this role was writing the bid for a Professional Qualifications Bill; we were only one of a few successful bids and it’s fantastic to see this become a reality with the bill being introduced in Early May.

More wider afield, I’ve learnt a lot about the world of politics having seen the knitty-gritty process of Brexit unfolding from the inside. I’ve worked with Ministers and seen the different relative interests and pressures of government responsibilities.

I’ve also greatly enjoyed being immersed in the world of the Civil Service– I have gained a wide array of skills (including project management and leadership & management qualifications) as well as a chance to really make a difference to the public. I’ve been heavily involved in Diversity and Inclusion, first chairing the Faith and Minority Ethnic (FAME) Network, where I had the opportunity to present to the Executive Committee and recommendations on Race.

I was my Group Diversity and Inclusion Coordinator, where I wrote and agreed with my Director General and Directors the first ever Group D&I Workplan, encompassing our ambition to create a more inclusive workplace for the 600 staff within the group.

I have particularly enjoyed being in BEIS – as far as government departments go, I find the atmosphere welcoming in particular, and the remit is very broad meaning there are plenty of opportunities to move internally and try something new. It’s why I’ve ended up staying for several years, rather than moving to another government department as other civil servants have done.

So whilst there have certainly been point where it’s been a challenging ride, if you ever get the opportunity I would certainly recommend BEIS as a great place to develop (or even start) your career. There are plenty of interesting pieces of work and a generally friendly and welcoming atmosphere.

Why Staff Networks are a force for good

Today is the National Day for Staff Networks. We celebrate the hard work that staff networks do in organisation’s across the world. Today also gives us an opportunity to highlight the hard work that goes behind staff networks, and in particular the countless time and effort of dedicated individuals often taking their personal time to make their organisation’s a better place.

Staff Networks, or Employee Resource Groups as they are sometimes called, are employee-led groups within an organisation. These are often based upon under-represented groups or protected characteristics, for example on race, LGBT+, Gender, Religion or Parental groups to name but a few.

Since joining the office workforce, I have found staff networks an invaluable and critical function within the business organisation. So much so I chaired the departmental race and faith network for two years, and am currently the Secretariat lead for the cross-government race forum!

The reason staff networks are so valuable is that they are a force for genuine positive support and change within an organisation. In a world where we often bemoan hierarchical structures with little opportunity to have our voice really heard, staff networks demonstrate a tried-and-tested way to really bring the voice of different staff together and give them to the organisation as a critical-friend.

With more emphasis and action towards Diversity and Inclusion, staff networks are often key sounding boards for HR initiatives that effect certain groups. For example, companies have spoken to their disability network to test products with a disability-lens attached. In other words, staff within the company can see how well the product would work for disabled individuals, and help ensure that accessibility features are in place. This is great for the organisation as it ensures a better-made product, whilst it also acknowledges and values the skills and experience that disabled staff have within the organisation too.

But at its best staff networks can go even further. In my time working as a network leader, I worked very closely with my HR to support, test and challenge new proposals, including on introducing new talent schemes, performance management measures or outreach initiatives on recruitment. In a space where HR budgets are tight, I could coordinate support via our volunteers to give valuable time and resource. Working in the Civil Service meant we had a wide-range of expertise including analysts, policy-professionals and event managers, meaning we could tap into a rich and vast set of experiences that would otherwise be left hidden away in silos within the organisation.

In my time, we gave critical feedback all the way up to the head of our organisation on the situation around race, building a movement to highlight and address systemic issues. Using data and analysis, we presented across Senior Management Teams, eventually leading us all the way up to the Executive Committee. I was even given the space to present a paper with a set of recommendations (all of which were agreed upon). It’s certainly not an experience I would have gotten without the recognition and creation of staff networks!

So today is a day to rejoice. Bringing people together in support of an organisation by making people’s voices heard is always an important thing to cherish. I do recognise that staff networks are often under-resourced or sub-optimally structured, however we must remember that these are essentially a free resource for the business ran by volunteers, and the amount they can bring to the table is far more than any set of external consultants trying to do the same thing!

So if you’re a member of an organisation with staff networks within them, I would really encourage you to get involved. A lot of blood, sweat and tears goes into maintaining them, and there is always a need for more volunteers. It’s a fantastic way of widening your own personal network, understanding more about the organisation’s objectives and give yourself an opportunity to pick up wider leadership skills. If your organisation does not have a staff network, why not set one up?

For further information about the National Day for Staff Networks check out https://www.nationaldayforstaffnetworks.co.uk/

Taking in nature to restore your wellbeing and energy

Last week was a Bank Holiday Weekend in the UK. Although the weather was quite hit-and-miss, I managed to go out to some local forests and woods over the weekend.

I must admit that I’ve never really paid that much attention to nature previously. I’ve grown up in cities, and tended to relegate visiting ‘green spaces’ to a walk at the city park or when on holiday to see the local exotic scenery. So I wasn’t really sure what I was going to get from popping out of the city to my local forest.

Perhaps it’s an added effect of the lockdown, but I found the opportunity to find silence in a forest unbelievably nourishing. Having spent most of my life in the space of a small apartment over the last six months, the freedom and release from covid-style living was extremely revitalising.

I found something reassuring in looking at the big tall trees all around me. It sounds a little silly in some senses, but the fact there are whole woodlands that have survived hundreds of years puts my own life in perspective. After all, the world is not going to end if I miss my close-of-play deadline, nor is our current situation under lockdown going to last forever either. Life will go on.

The fact that there was a whole ecosystem of life around me – the birds, animals, plants and bugs – also made me realise that the world doesn’t revolve around me either. My obsessions on my wants and needs aren’t all that important in the grand scheme of things!

I am someone who tends to find my burnout zone is when my mind is constantly looking for stimulation, including often when sleeping or just as I wake up. Unfortunately the lockdown has exacerbated my use of technology and social media, which has meant I am often over-stimulated, with little opportunity to release it.

I found going way outside of my usual habitat to a forest give me a massive piece of perspective on my life. I’ve also found I appreciate nature far more than I ever previously have because of it. With Spring coming and better weather (hopefully), it’s something I will look to do far more often, as I’m currently quite fortunate to be able to jump on public transport to do so.

So if you’re in need of some revitalisation, I would really recommend going out to take some nature. I realise not all of us can easily access big woodlands or natural spaces, but even going out to the park and popping in some headphones to play forest sounds can imitate the immersive experience.

When was the last time you popped out for a spot of nature for your wellbeing?